16 ms·
It is becoming more and more apparent that with every piece of technology that is not really turn on/turn off you have to justify the investment.I get that this
by holydude 9y ago
It is becoming more and more apparent that with every piece of technology that is not really turn on/turn off you have to justify the investment.I get that this is an opinionated piece of software and solves basecamp's kind of issues but I do not see it being widely adopted.
That said I wish people behind RoR would actually work on better integration with things like React and Vue.
- cmwoodall 9y agohttps://github.com/rails/webpacker#integrations https://github.com/rails/webpacker#integrations
- danmaz74 9y agoDefinitely agree. What would be really great is an easy way to symc the status between client and server, with generators for the api and a client library to manage the status which could then be used with react or any other similar front end framework.
- meesterdude 9y agoRails is an open source web development framework that excels in productivity by coming with smart defaults for people to use to get up and running quickly. Rails already integrates with webpack, and you can certainly implement your own integrations to further advance things - and you can turn around and make this a gem for others to use, or contribute it to core if its something more fundamental. But for the most part, the people behind RoR are pretty happy using RoR for their development, and don't need to use React or Vue for a majority of what they do.
- bromuro 9y agoReact and vue are great for creating interactive widgets (no flash anymore). it doesnt’t mean necessarily to change how we code :)
- gedy 9y agoThey have improved the integration with Webpacker, but also bear in mind if you don't use the HTML/UI type functionality in Rails, it's a lot less compelling. I'm assuming DHH/RoR is sensitive to that hence these solutions like TurboLinks, Stimulus, etc that still use server rendered HTML.