3 ms·
Just need to be able to run Chrome/Firefox directly in a Docker instance, and we’d be there. But seriously, maybe that’s the next step in this crazy ride we’re
by MR4D 9y ago
Just need to be able to run Chrome/Firefox directly in a Docker instance, and we’d be there.
But seriously, maybe that’s the next step in this crazy ride we’re all on.
- nnutter 9y agohttps://github.com/jessfraz/dockerfiles/blob/master/chrome/stable/Dockerfile https://github.com/jessfraz/dockerfiles/blob/master/chrome/s... https://github.com/jessfraz/dockerfiles/blob/master/firefox/Dockerfile https://github.com/jessfraz/dockerfiles/blob/master/firefox/...
- cm2187 9y agoWe may even need something stronger than docker. There are various project to use virtualization technology to sandbox a browser session at the hardware level. My guess is that ultimately this is the future of web browser.
- j_s 9y agoOne commercially supported Windows [browser] application virtualization (-ish, pretty much Docker-grade security for end users) option, $35 for personal use: https://www.sandboxie.com https://www.sandboxie.com Most similar tools are marketed as antivirus products, and are only available via enterprise licensing and/or SaaS reporting. An example of a hardware virtualization based option: https://www.bromium.com/platform/our-technology.html https://www.bromium.com/platform/our-technology.html
- greenhouse_gas 9y agoOr firejail