5 ms·
> The poster, a European, said that one of the things they liked about HN was that when the discussion drifted too deep into an SV-centric view, people from oth
by harryf 9y ago
> The poster, a European, said that one of the things they liked about HN was that when the discussion drifted too deep into an SV-centric view, people from other parts of the world would often provide a useful corrective that would then be upvoted.
It's actually fascinating to observe how the "tone" of HN varies through the day. My impression (I haven't carefully analyzed) is that during the morning in Europe you tend to have more left leaning points of view politically and more advocacy of Stallman-esque Open Source.
Once the US gets online though the political spectrum of opinions shifts right and towards Libiterianism. You also have people working at places like Google and Facebook adding their 2 cents, which tends to lead to "moral outrage" (European) vs "here's the reality" (US).
- dsfyu404ed 9y agoIf your point is not well argued you'll get a few down-votes. If you point is very well argued you'll get a lot of down-votes. Nothing makes people down-vote more than an opinion they don't like but can't easily refute or dismiss.
- wpietri 9y agoThis is a very interesting theory! I hope somebody gets a bee in their bonnet enough to gather some data.
- viridian 9y ago.