3 ms·

Including the Valve Employee that confirmed their issue?

• user5994461 9y ago
  Including you who commented on the issue and is affiliated to the bot. You're a living case of a criminal trying to pretend he's not a criminal after he's caught.
  • Kr4ken 9y ago
    Yes, I commented on the issue. No, I am not affiliated with the bot. I'm not pretending to be anything, I never claimed anything. If I wanted to hide anything I wouldn't use my main github account. I just thought that Valve banning based on usernames was an interesting subject, so I commented on it. You're commenting on a thread about cheaters, why would you do so? You're a living case of a criminal trying to pretend he's not a criminal after he's caught hands in!
  • pdkl95 9y ago
    Do you have evidence to support your accusation of affiliation with the people involved with "catbot"[1]? Or is this libel? > criminal Writing unauthorized software modifications for commercial software is not illegal, making your accusation of criminal activity doesn't make sense. Unless the bot also made copies of the software, this is a civil matter and probably at worst a breech of contract. However, even if someone authored the bot, unsubstantiated accusations have no place in civilized society. If accusations are being made, you need to provide evidence 0of the actual bot, not hearsay based on merely an account name. That evidence needs to be presented with at lest some amount of due process where the accused has the opportunity to face their accuser and rebut the claim. [1] Or any other unauthorized 3rd-party utility software for games published on Steam.
• dkonofalski 9y ago
  The Valve employee only confirmed that the bans were correct and that GitHub was not the correct place to dispute the bans. A different employee on Reddit has already confirmed that the "issue" reported on GitHub is incorrect and that the bans were instituted based on multiple criteria. They can't go into it any further without risking compromising their detection systems.