5 ms·
I think the author has gone through a mistaken involution in his exposition of his own alleged involution, which means that his "Ghost Not" is, ironically, true
by jacinabox 9y ago
I think the author has gone through a mistaken involution in his exposition of his own alleged involution, which means that his "Ghost Not" is, ironically, true and his proposed remedy a fallacy.
- gt_ 9y agoInvolution? The low-res versions of these concepts are as old as recorded thought. Maybe I don't grasp your assertion. What do you propose is the mistake? And did the author propose a remedy, other than 'alchemy'?
- jacinabox 9y agoBy involution I meant that the author, is proposing a picture in which some people (congenitally or by nature) tell the exact opposite of the truth, aka lies, if you read the article closely. I was merely suggesting, that if someone was going to point the finger, the finger could be pointing back at them if you know what I mean.