4 ms·

The question is like why those users do not use iPhone or Samsung Galaxy 7

saagarjha 9y ago
You’re being disingenuous: people don’t use iPhones or Galaxies because they’re expensive. Browsers are free and it doesn’t cost money to change them.
- cwyers 9y ago
  And the people who author mobile Chrome all use iPhones or Galaxies or Pixels. It's about the dogfooding -- the people who write UC Browser use it on the same phones, mobile networks and websites that the users of UC Browser use, so it's written with their needs in mind.
  - EKLM-ZK88 9y ago
    I guess that's what i dont understand, what are the needs of the people in this market and what about chrome or firefox fails to meet that need? It doesn't have flexbox support, and i would imagine that would break a ton of modern websites. It isn't like these markets have their own version of html/css, everyone's on the same web, so why go for a browser with worse support for modern standards?
    - lurenjia 9y ago
      Users don't know/care about flexbox at all. It's developers concern. Also UC has much more features and builtin contents than chrome. Maybe UC can provide better user experience to new internet users that think typing urls on phones to see news and videos weird. Not everyone likes minimalism.
      - addicted 9y ago
        Your last sentence is very important. At least Chinese markets (and possibly Indian and others as well)do not seem to have the disdain for feature loading American markets do. Weibo is one of the most popular apps in the markwt (if not most) and it’s practically an operating system of its own. I suspect it would have gotten nowhere in US markets because people would have complained about it being not focused and having a bad UI.
  - saagarjha 9y ago
    Which is a roundabout way of saying mobile Chrome doesn’t work well on lower end devices, which is why many users switch to it. This is the reason why I (and a distant parent, I’d assume) was looking for.
pmontra 9y ago
One less zero in the price tag looks like a pretty good reason. The article is explicitly about low end phones.

You’re being disingenuous: people don’t use iPhones or Galaxies because they’re expensive. Browsers are free and it doesn’t cost money to change them.

cwyers 9y ago
And the people who author mobile Chrome all use iPhones or Galaxies or Pixels. It's about the dogfooding -- the people who write UC Browser use it on the same phones, mobile networks and websites that the users of UC Browser use, so it's written with their needs in mind.
- EKLM-ZK88 9y ago
  I guess that's what i dont understand, what are the needs of the people in this market and what about chrome or firefox fails to meet that need? It doesn't have flexbox support, and i would imagine that would break a ton of modern websites. It isn't like these markets have their own version of html/css, everyone's on the same web, so why go for a browser with worse support for modern standards?
  - lurenjia 9y ago
    Users don't know/care about flexbox at all. It's developers concern. Also UC has much more features and builtin contents than chrome. Maybe UC can provide better user experience to new internet users that think typing urls on phones to see news and videos weird. Not everyone likes minimalism.
    - addicted 9y ago
      Your last sentence is very important. At least Chinese markets (and possibly Indian and others as well)do not seem to have the disdain for feature loading American markets do. Weibo is one of the most popular apps in the markwt (if not most) and it’s practically an operating system of its own. I suspect it would have gotten nowhere in US markets because people would have complained about it being not focused and having a bad UI.
- saagarjha 9y ago
  Which is a roundabout way of saying mobile Chrome doesn’t work well on lower end devices, which is why many users switch to it. This is the reason why I (and a distant parent, I’d assume) was looking for.

pmontra 9y ago

One less zero in the price tag looks like a pretty good reason. The article is explicitly about low end phones.