3 ms·
I have a problem with the "lawful" part, though -- it's not the business of the network operator to judge lawfulness.
by CamperBob 16y ago
I have a problem with the "lawful" part, though -- it's not the business of the network operator to judge lawfulness.
- moultano 16y agoThen what criteria would you use that includes everything reasonable, but excludes botnets, malware, dos attacks and the like?
- tonfa 16y agoThe term usually used is "harmful content" (in the sense it hinders the network to function properly).
- CamperBob 16y agoIf it harms users other than the ones who left their systems unprotected, then it would be a good candidate for intervention. Neutrality shouldn't be a suicide pact for the ISP, but a set of operating guidelines that cover situations short of outright abuse and vandalism.