3 ms·
I have seen this done by a couple different people. They were not recognized as insightful, and more often recognized as annoying. They also often don't summari
by gregmac 9y ago
I have seen this done by a couple different people. They were not recognized as insightful, and more often recognized as annoying. They also often don't summarize properly but it's easier to let them conclude and pretend they were useful than to debate with them.
The more important thing is the actual meeting notes are accurate. (I also strongly believe that a meeting without published notes is largely useless and irrelevant, but that's a while other topic.)
- nkrisc 9y agoOf course, that will never work in any sane place. The point I was making is all these "sabotage" behaviors are actually the sorts of things that get you promoted at toxic places.
- maxxxxx 9y agoI don't think the place has to be that toxic. In most larger companies there is a lot of political posturing going and these strategies all can be very useful under certain circumstances. The good players are just not too blatant about it.