3 ms·
Your analogy is severely flawed as my door lock is under my control and I know about the risks (i.e it is unlocked) so I can take the steps I need to mitigate t
by syshum 9y ago
Your analogy is severely flawed as my door lock is under my control and I know about the risks (i.e it is unlocked) so I can take the steps I need to mitigate that risk
For your analogy to apply here it would be the manufacturer of the door lock having a master key stolen then not telling anyone about it until they have a new lock for you to buy from them, in the case of a lock I would want to know that the lock is useless even if there was not solution so I can mitigate the risk no simply continue locking it believing it to be secure
- neerajsi 9y agoLocksmiths can get into many locks that people use to secure their houses. That doesn't mean that I want them to share that knowledge widely.
- pixl97 9y agoEh, that information is shared widely. Some decent googl-fu will get you the information you want. The difference is a lock-pick can't exploit 20,000 doors in 20 minutes.
- syshum 9y agoI see so now we are advocating for the suppression of Speech... Because how else are you going to prevent that? Pretty sure there are 100's of youtube vidoes on lock picking, you want to ban all of them?
- nske 9y agoI want them to. This puts more pressure for locks to improve and makes it less likely that I trust my current lock.