Wouldn't each and every person use it were it available? But we accept risk when we go into national parks. They are intended to be wilderness. They are not you

Wouldn't each and every person use it were it available? But we accept risk when we go into national parks. They are intended to be wilderness. They are not your town park and this is posted many times throughout them. The idea that it might "Save just one" makes it a viable option is false. Danger is a beautiful part of nature and destroying the last vestiges of Earth as close to beyond human influence as possible in order to cover edge cases is ignorant of the realities of life. We don't mourn the wing-suiters who crash into mountains on their flights. The same for the people who venture into dangerous territory. Otherwise, where is the limit for abdicating the responsibility of our own safety?