3 ms·
Ironically, the article doesn't really discuss any legitimate reason as to why Sweden is – or indeed will be – fine despite automation. It's all about what Swed
by textor 9y ago
Ironically, the article doesn't really discuss any legitimate reason as to why Sweden is – or indeed will be – fine despite automation. It's all about what Swedes expect and how much they trust their present society to hold. Also, labor union propaganda, but that's tangential.
So, the takeaway is that Americans believe business to be cutthroat and competition to be effective at weeding out the least optimized actors, whereas Swedes feel that employers will take care of employees because this is a nice Sweden thing to do, or something.
Beliefs, expectations, feelings, self-affirmations. «Everything is fine, we can provide everyone with jobs, we can even support a large and growing number of uneducated refugees and help them get jobs, we just need to innovate faster than anyone to be sure that our market share won't ever diminish, it'll all work out in the end". Well. Guess it's pleasant to be so positive. But how is any of this even relevant to the issue? The issue being, mind you, automation-induced joblessness, not people's anxiety about it.
- WhoBeI 9y agoIf people aren't scared of automation there won't be any political pressure to restrict automation. This will probably increase the adoptation rate so I'd say it matters a lot in the discussion. There will be problems because of automation and I think most Swedes realize this. The safety nets that are in place provide a buffer, and possible solutions, if you should loose your job because of it. I'd say that's where the optimistic attitude in this article comes from. Sustaining those safety nets is indeed going to be hard if unemployment increases. There probably won't be any "silver bullet" solution to the problem either. [edit] spelling