3 ms·

If you look at all federal taxes, as this analysis of CBO numbers does [1], then it seems that the top 1% take 18% of income and pay 28% of all federal taxes.

If you look at all federal taxes, as this analysis of CBO numbers does [1], then it seems that the top 1% take 18% of income and pay 28% of all federal taxes. So, you are right that the portion of all federal taxes is not as great as I made it seem in my parent comment, that comment only takes into account federal income tax. But, I believe the overarching point and conclusion still stands. 1 - https://www.factcheck.org/2008/05/top-1-what-they-make-and-pay/ https://www.factcheck.org/2008/05/top-1-what-they-make-and-p...

Robotbeat 9y ago
You mean, that there's a progressive tax system rather than a regressive one? Yeah, that is a triumph of decency and something we should not take for granted! This is something we should try to do MORE of.
- ImSkeptical 9y ago
  I think progressive taxes are fine, my point was that the rich are paying their fair share.
  - cmurf 9y ago
    No, because they are getting wealthier at a greater rate than either the middle class or poor. The U.S. didn't used to have this problem when the upper tax bracket rate was above 70%. It's plausible it doesn't need to be that high if deductions aren't as generous as they were when taxes were that high (for more than a generation by the way, so it's not like extremely high taxes at the top brackets has some civilization ending result - we already know it doesn't, in fact it acts as a strong incentive to avoid taxes by taking deductions in creative ways which ideally also have a social benefit).
Retric 9y ago
How do the counting is also really important. Note, links that's a decade out of date (2005) numbers and the newer numbers look a little different even using those metrics. Also, CBO numbers significantly understate the earnings of the top 1 percent. Mark Zuckerberg for example has a net worth of ~70 billion yet that money is vastly greater than the sum of his 'income' over his lifetime.

Robotbeat 9y ago

You mean, that there's a progressive tax system rather than a regressive one? Yeah, that is a triumph of decency and something we should not take for granted! This is something we should try to do MORE of.

ImSkeptical 9y ago
I think progressive taxes are fine, my point was that the rich are paying their fair share.
- cmurf 9y ago
  No, because they are getting wealthier at a greater rate than either the middle class or poor. The U.S. didn't used to have this problem when the upper tax bracket rate was above 70%. It's plausible it doesn't need to be that high if deductions aren't as generous as they were when taxes were that high (for more than a generation by the way, so it's not like extremely high taxes at the top brackets has some civilization ending result - we already know it doesn't, in fact it acts as a strong incentive to avoid taxes by taking deductions in creative ways which ideally also have a social benefit).

Retric 9y ago

How do the counting is also really important. Note, links that's a decade out of date (2005) numbers and the newer numbers look a little different even using those metrics. Also, CBO numbers significantly understate the earnings of the top 1 percent. Mark Zuckerberg for example has a net worth of ~70 billion yet that money is vastly greater than the sum of his 'income' over his lifetime.