5 ms·
Visual Basic's relatively strong ranking is interesting; my recollection was while VBA could be an extremely productive language, it was also a very "brittle" o
by sixtypoundhound 9y ago
Visual Basic's relatively strong ranking is interesting; my recollection was while VBA could be an extremely productive language, it was also a very "brittle" one.
I recall many VBA projects where I was flying along using my favorite toolkit / framework for a specific domain, until we hit something that wasn't "in the manual" - at which point, peering inside the beast became very hard. So 30% of time spend cranking out useful code and 60% of the time spent clearing some arcane roadblock because a client wanted something that didn't neatly fit the standard.
Python's standard library has always seemed much more flexible (and when necessary, comprehensible) in comparison...
- ryanbrunner 9y agoVBA and VB are very different languages that share a syntax. I agree wholeheartedly with your assessment of VBA, but in VB you had much better type support (by no means perfect still), better tooling, better static analysis, proper compilation (It's been a while so I can't remember how it worked under the hood, but you'd at least be aware of type errors early).