3 ms·
> But after running the analysis on the page again, it changed its mind about that review and decided it was now legitimate. This doesn't sound very reliable.
by LV-426 9y ago
> But after running the analysis on the page again, it changed its mind about that review and decided it was now legitimate.
This doesn't sound very reliable. If nothing had changed on the review, what's the basis for it changing its mind?
- bartl 9y agoIt probably is a learning system... It got trained more. The review itself doesn't have to change. The system merely adjusted its parameters due to more exposure to new reviews.
- LV-426 9y agoPossibly, yeah. I was also under the misapprehension the re-analyse button came up (randomly) immediately after a review, but it seems it appears on old stored reviews. Anyone who uses this site really needs to do a re-analysis, because on the products I just tested I'd rate its prior ability to detect fakes (reviews and reviewers) at F. After re-analysis I'll upgrade its ability to C. TBH, I don't understand the point. I trust my own ability to evaluate reviews more than the unknown logic of a third party website, which may have its own interests/motives influencing its reviews of reviews.