4 ms·
Addendum: For what it's worth, it seems some people aren't fond of Diehard any more. To quote Chris Doty-Humphrey, the author of PractRand: > In empirical test
by Veedrac 9y ago
Addendum: For what it's worth, it seems some people aren't fond of Diehard any more. To quote Chris Doty-Humphrey, the author of PractRand:
> In empirical testing, a classic is the Diehard program by Marsaglia. That program is badly outdated today and should not be used anymore, but it was, so far as I know, the first real standardized battery of such tests.
More information is available on their website: http://pracrand.sourceforge.net/PractRand.txt http://pracrand.sourceforge.net/PractRand.txt.
- FabHK 9y agoFrom what I gather, decent PRNG tests today are - L'Ecuyer's TestU01 (with SmallCrush, Crush, BigCrush), and - Doty-Humphrey's pracrand with its PractRand suite