4 ms·
Do your rules correctly handle ownerships that cannot be modelled as acyclical directed graphs (ACGs) (i.e. ownership hierarchies with loops in them)?
by qubex 9y ago
Do your rules correctly handle ownerships that cannot be modelled as acyclical directed graphs (ACGs) (i.e. ownership hierarchies with loops in them)?
- eries 9y agoOur rules follow existing SEC rules for beneficial ownership; they tend not to take a very CS-centric view of things :)
- qubex 9y agoDoes that mean that you do not speak of ownership in terms of a weighted graph of nodes, or that indeed your rules do break down when there is a possibility of circular references?
- jacques_chester 9y agoI imagine all such graphs in the USA will have humans as root nodes, since the 14th amendment makes it a bit tricky to create ownership edges into humans.
- qubex 9y agoThat is very true, I’m a fool for not having thought that ultimately it all has to culminate with humans that cannot be ’owned’.