2 ms·
This is a good point. In the interest of a constructive way to go forward, I think a "how can we make this better" process will save more lives than outrage. It
by menacingly 9y ago
This is a good point. In the interest of a constructive way to go forward, I think a "how can we make this better" process will save more lives than outrage. It's the outrage that the unions are so skilled at skirting.
- anigbrowl 9y agoThis isn't exactly the first time this has happened, is it? We already have many review processes in train and it doesn't seem to be making a whole lot of difference, which is why people are outraged. Here's the problem: you want to draft even more procedures and guidelines and checks and balances (even though we're already neck-deep in bureaucracy), while SWAT teams are guided by a philosophy of 'move fast and break things.' Here's some actionable suggestions we can use right off the bat: * ban police unions * automatic trials for all homicides * police shooters are isolate din protective custody * SWAT team leaders are automatically retired from active duty whenever an innocent person is injured or killed Really I think it's a bit insulting to innocent victims to be 'let's all calm down and have a review process' as if we haven't been through these questions hundreds o times already.