3 ms·
Normally this is a valid discussion to have, but I don't think it has any merit here. The projects analyzed were launched in 2016. You're suggesting that a stat
by foobarchu 9y ago
Normally this is a valid discussion to have, but I don't think it has any merit here. The projects analyzed were launched in 2016. You're suggesting that a statistically significant number of people completed a project centered around a concept as fast-moving and heavily researched as blockchain could be feature-complete and bug free in under a year and a half. I'd believe that maybe a dozen projects like that exist, but not nearly enough to affect these numbers.
The bigger issue here is how many of those 26k projects are dead-end forks for playing around.
- onion2k 9y ago"Playing around" in many cases will mean "learning the technology", and those developers would have then moved to other blockchain projects. That means the code is "dead" in the sense that it's finished, but it'd be unfair to suggest it's "abandoned".