I don't think you understand the argument being made. Further down you say: > the tone of the paragraph is that it's not really medication, but something like

I don't think you understand the argument being made. Further down you say: > the tone of the paragraph is that it's not really medication, but something like caffeine which you can give to everyone and it'll have the same effect. It doesn't work like that. It does work like that. You can give it to everyone, and (assuming the recipient has a good response, no side effects, etc.) it'll have the same effect. That effect might be "worth" more to people who are already at the low end of the bell curve, but it's the same effect. > It's not just about being an office drone spending 12 hours a day in Excel or some cynical bullshit like that, it's about every day life. Spending many hours in a row at a desk working on tasks that require extreme focus is my every day life, and the life of most of the people on this site I'd wager. Where are you going with this? You're replying to an article that said "it helps everyone", and you're trying to say that some people aren't as worthy of help? Is that really where you want to go with this?