4 ms·

This got me thinking why police officers in the US tend to use gun as a weapon of their high priority choice. Consider many people in the US owns gun, maybe it

by rqs 9y ago

This got me thinking why police officers in the US tend to use gun as a weapon of their high priority choice. Consider many people in the US owns gun, maybe it's because of those officers are fear of death (It's very normal) so they tend to act first to save themselves? As an outsider, I don't think it's a good thing to allow people to own a gun. Because people are different in general, some easy to anger, some more likely to hurt other. It doesn't mean they are naturally bad, they may just need longer time to cold themselves down. And gun is too quick and lethal, ripped than chance from them. If people need to protect themselves, maybe allowing them to own a taser instead?

mobilefriendly 9y ago
You don't understand how culturally deep the 2nd Amendment is for many Americans. The right to bear arms is a foundational freedom, enshrined in the Bill of Rights. The country was founded in violent revolution and then expanded across a wilderness frontier. Firearms are a key part of that history. The view is also that people aren't truly free unless they have the ability to resist government tyranny. The 2nd Amendment has actually expanded pretty dramatically in the last two decades-- many states have expanded concealed carry and the feds have rolled back so-called assault weapons bans, and the courts have strengthened the 2nd Amendment as an individual right. You'll literally have a civil war if you tried to disarm the population.
- kazagistar 9y ago
  It's ironic how little a gun helps in resisting actual tyranny. There isn't anything emperical about those gun beliefs. All my friends who have guns own them because they hunt, like shooting them as a hobby, and/or like the feeling of power it affords.
  - duckMuppet 9y ago
    Apparently you've never been to Iraq or Afghanistan. It's also interesting your empirical research methods have a terrible fear of analysing history.. Besides the above, how did that recent uprising in Catalonia work out... Tweet, hold signs, vigils, hashtag whatever.. Without the blood of sacrifice and guns to make it painful, those people were really just pissing into the wind.

by rqs 9y ago

mobilefriendly 9y ago

You don't understand how culturally deep the 2nd Amendment is for many Americans. The right to bear arms is a foundational freedom, enshrined in the Bill of Rights. The country was founded in violent revolution and then expanded across a wilderness frontier. Firearms are a key part of that history. The view is also that people aren't truly free unless they have the ability to resist government tyranny. The 2nd Amendment has actually expanded pretty dramatically in the last two decades-- many states have expanded concealed carry and the feds have rolled back so-called assault weapons bans, and the courts have strengthened the 2nd Amendment as an individual right. You'll literally have a civil war if you tried to disarm the population.

kazagistar 9y ago
It's ironic how little a gun helps in resisting actual tyranny. There isn't anything emperical about those gun beliefs. All my friends who have guns own them because they hunt, like shooting them as a hobby, and/or like the feeling of power it affords.
- duckMuppet 9y ago
  Apparently you've never been to Iraq or Afghanistan. It's also interesting your empirical research methods have a terrible fear of analysing history.. Besides the above, how did that recent uprising in Catalonia work out... Tweet, hold signs, vigils, hashtag whatever.. Without the blood of sacrifice and guns to make it painful, those people were really just pissing into the wind.