Agree with the strange profession. However, to accountants defense: the rules are pretty open and in any industry, most professional insiders easily know most o

Agree with the strange profession. However, to accountants defense: the rules are pretty open and in any industry, most professional insiders easily know most of the loopholes. It's the layman / politician / civil servant that might get fooled because their common sense does not hold up. In the case of Uber, not a single investor will not recognize this. Where does this go wrong? SME where the accountant has to expect less questions, since there are no professionals watching the stock. That's why banks do their own due diligence (and p2p lending is more risky). Investing in individual stocks based on your reading of an annual report. No way you are more savvy than the leeways an accountant has.