4 ms·
This is a very strange and unconvincing article. Greenland is massive; and, while it's very hard to give 'worth' to part of a country (and potentially misguided
by room271 9y ago
This is a very strange and unconvincing article. Greenland is massive; and, while it's very hard to give 'worth' to part of a country (and potentially misguided to attempt to do so in most cases), $2bn is pocket change for a wealthy country, and the potential upsides of owning such a vast tract of land are much bigger over time.
If I was offered $2b or such a large swathe of land, I know which I would take.
(The argument becomes crass anyway when you consider that real people live there.)
- exelius 9y agoSure real people live there, and selling it to the US wouldn’t change that. Real people live in many US territories. Life for a resident probably wouldn't change all that much under US rule. It’s a huge amount of land, but most of it is covered in kilometer-thick glaciers. It’s not really all that usable; plus its strategic location in the North Atlantic shipping lanes makes it a liability in the event of war. Even if the US and Denmark have a falling out, an aggressive American military would likely make Greenland its first target. In any case, the US gets what it wants for free; the Danes seem happy with the current arrangement, so it’s water under the bridge. This is a pretty convincing pragmatic argument, but pragmatism goes out the window when national pride is involved.
- dghughes 9y ago> Greenland is massive It's not as big as you think. Greenland's land area is 2.1 million sq. km about the size of Saudi Arabia. But looking at it on a map you'd think Greenland was nearly the size of Canada (~10 million sq. km).
- rimliu 9y agoStill about 50x of the size of the Denmark.
- erk__ 9y agoIt does also not take into concidaration that denmark was at "war" with norway because of greenland few years earlier.[0] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_the_Red%27s_Land https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_the_Red%27s_Land