2 ms·
> Additionally this CVE relies on the getuid syscall being available, there is no reason to give a container this syscall, you should block it, Huh? Lots of le
by jwilk 9y ago
> Additionally this CVE relies on the getuid syscall being available, there is no reason to give a container this syscall, you should block it,
Huh? Lots of legitimate things will break without working getuid().
> you should block it, ala this guide
getuid() doesn't require any capabilities, so it can't be blocked by taking them away.
- hacknat 9y agoOops good call. I meant setuid, but either way I was wrong.