4 ms·
Best of ArXiv.org for AI, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning – November 2017
- nerdponx 9y agoIs there a way to track which Arxiv papers get republished in peer-reviewed journals?
- nl 9y agoNot really, AFIAK. You can check https://openreview.net/ https://openreview.net/ though. Most Arxiv papers from Google/FB/OpenAI get a pretty good review on Twitter and /r/MachineLearning. Some Arxiv papers say "under review for NIPS (or whatever)".
- chillee 9y agoOpenreview is only for iclr, so you'll be missing a lot of papers. To the above poster, in ML journals aren't the main means of publication. You want to look at conferences like ICLR, NIPS, CVPR, etc.
- nl 9y agoSome NIPS workshops use Openreview[1]. (I kind of assumed the poster meant "journals or conference proceedings") [1] https://openreview.net/group?id=NIPS.cc/2017/Workshop/Autodiff https://openreview.net/group?id=NIPS.cc/2017/Workshop/Autodi...
- chillee 9y agoYep I'm aware haha. I made https://chillee.github.io/OpenReviewExplorer/ https://chillee.github.io/OpenReviewExplorer/, so I'd love if all conferences used openreview.
- JustFinishedBSG 9y agoPlease stop with those "Best of AI papers". This isn't how science work, this isn't how anything works
- chillee 9y agoWhat's your problem with these lists? I don't think making these lists is necessarily incompatible with the peer review process. Orals or spotlight presentations at conferences are effectively "best of" lists anyways.