10 ms·
The article took 7.8 seconds to "fully" load for me, however the text was readable in under 300ms. Loading ads of screen doesn't bother me. Also, I'm not sure
by true_religion 9y ago
The article took 7.8 seconds to "fully" load for me, however the text was readable in under 300ms. Loading ads of screen doesn't bother me.
Also, I'm not sure where the irony is here. They're talking about anti-adblocking, so it's hardly ironic that they use advertisements themselves.
- leeoniya 9y ago> Loading ads of screen doesn't bother me. congratulations! - you now have 70 new tracking cookies - a degraded battery - have exceeded your bandwidth allotment - probably some malware payload that exfiltrated your contacts via a 0-day XSS - almost certainly slower UI/scrolling performance > Also, I'm not sure where the irony is here. the irony of degrading people's experience [via popups, countdowns, etc] who refuse to load slow and annoying ads.