4 ms·
The latter feels like a classic case of questions for which the answer is unhelpfully, 42. That is to say, do we even know what the question is? We have no real
by QAPereo 9y ago
The latter feels like a classic case of questions for which the answer is unhelpfully, 42. That is to say, do we even know what the question is? We have no real reason to believe that the universe came from nothing, or that nothing exists in a way that isn’t purely Conceptual. Certainly all of our explorations into the nature of nature indicate complete absence of nothingness, which may go someway to explaining the popularity of theories which don’t require it. Cyclic universes, cyclic ekpyrotic universes, multiverses and more all essentially attempt to reframe the question on nature’s terms, not ours.
So it’s interesting to think about, but there are reasons to believe that humans will always lack the tools to find the answers. Imo that makes it feel like questions about the existence of god, or an afterlife. They are important and have massive bearing on our existence, but I doubt in our ability to answer them, or even to ask the right questions in the first place. In that sense, they’re less interesting than questions we can actually formulate and hope to answer, like the “hows” rather than the “whys” of existence.
- csomar 9y agoNothing is a concept; therefore it should exist, no? The only possible exception I can think of is if concepts are actually physical the way physical reality is.
- QAPereo 9y agoWe can’t even imagine nothing though... it’s just a word we use to describe a state which may not and may never have existed.
- renox 9y agoIn classic physic, nothing is a concept true, in quantum physic with the foam of virtual particles coming from the void (see casimir effect) 'nothing' is a much nebulous concept!