> My impression as a layman is that quantamagazine.org is leaking a lot of ... ambitious ... physics headlines into HN; I've kind of stopped clicking on them a

> My impression as a layman is that quantamagazine.org is leaking a lot of ... ambitious ... physics headlines into HN; I've kind of stopped clicking on them after the first few. I find this to be a repeated pattern where some fault is immediately assumed by the submission without any explanations to support their case as to why HN audience should mistrust it. > Physicists in the audience, is that an accurate assessment or should I go back to excitedly clicking through when I see them? It doesn't instill much confidence to call something shit and then forcing the onus on somebody else with more expertise to support their jaundiced claim without any supporting arguments. At least if you are going to call something as untrustworthy, back it up with examples and clear explanations as to why we should not trust it.