> This is a bit ridiculous, as the questions aren't specific. The issue is the editorialising the results, and not providing the other questions they asked, th

> This is a bit ridiculous, as the questions aren't specific. The issue is the editorialising the results, and not providing the other questions they asked, the actual results, or a more detailed description of the methodology. If they did that we could ignore the article and potentially discovery something useful in the results. > Also, what is a SQL server reporting system doing asking people about sexual harassment? That's gone over my head.