3 ms·
This ignores diminishing returns of additional labour and consumption. If we reach the happy situation where robots are providing us with the things we need fo
by djrobstep 9y ago
This ignores diminishing returns of additional labour and consumption.
If we reach the happy situation where robots are providing us with the things we need for a good life almost automatically, why would we continue to work ourselves to the bone for additional goods and services that won't increase our happiness much? Most people would rather just work less.
In fact, our current level of economic output is enough to give every household a comfortable life, even if we worked substantially less.
Unfortunately the system is structured to maximize labour time, keep us economically insecure, and use us all as grist for the capitalist mill, rather than maximizing leisure time and quality of life.
- Eridrus 9y agoThere is a fundamental competition baked into existence in the form of land rights and human attention. Who gets to live where? Who are your friends? Who gets to go to that fancy college? While there are other ways of answering this question than "those who can afford it", it will always exist in some form. While automation of necessities will make it easier to opt out of the capitalist mill, I would expect that to not be a tradeoff-free choice.