3 ms·
This is a bit ridiculous, as the questions aren't specific. For example, I've definitely said something some people might consider offensive at work in the past
by ameister14 9y ago
This is a bit ridiculous, as the questions aren't specific. For example, I've definitely said something some people might consider offensive at work in the past year, but it wasn't sexist and it was in context. According to this, I would be categorized into 'made sexist remarks' regardless.
If you send a friend a direct message on slack with a comic that other people might find offensive, or reference something that they did the night or week before, would that fall into multiple categories?
I've designed surveys before and been trained to do so in a way that limits inherent bias. This doesn't seem to be a well thought out or designed survey set. Also, what is a SQL server reporting system doing asking people about sexual harassment?
- ScottAS 9y ago100% agree. Some of the questions are ambiguously worded but the results are displayed through the lens of sexism.
- parenthephobia 9y ago> This is a bit ridiculous, as the questions aren't specific. The issue is the editorialising the results, and not providing the other questions they asked, the actual results, or a more detailed description of the methodology. If they did that we could ignore the article and potentially discovery something useful in the results. > Also, what is a SQL server reporting system doing asking people about sexual harassment? That's gone over my head.
- ameister14 9y agoat the bottom, the small print says the survey is from SSRS