53 ms·
I think it's a lot of things. Any lawyer is insured to the level that makes sense for their work, so at some level that's really not a differentiating factor.
by jacques_chester 9y ago
I think it's a lot of things. Any lawyer is insured to the level that makes sense for their work, so at some level that's really not a differentiating factor.
A lot of it comes down to things as varied as depth of bench, using their famous letterhead as a club, familiarity and traditional relationship, old boy's network and so on and so forth.
But it's still silly to give a one-conspiracy-fits-all account of the legal world.
- te_chris 9y agoI should've been more explicit, I meant against bringing it in-house. My partner is an experienced commercial real estate lawyer so, really, I'm just reflecting her view - she's worked on both sides, in-house and private practice. The only reason, in her experience, that companies don't bring that sort of work in-house is insurance and the hassle of liability being worn by the law firm rather than the company. Also, it allows the client (i.e. manager at the client) to have someone to blame when it all goes tits up.