3 ms·
Actually, per a comment above, this article likely understates the prevalence of more serious harassment (bordering on rape, e.g. coercive sex). So this "SJW" d
by sidlls 9y ago
Actually, per a comment above, this article likely understates the prevalence of more serious harassment (bordering on rape, e.g. coercive sex). So this "SJW" doesn't think it's necessarily a good thing.
- weberc2 9y agoThe original comment was clearly trolling, but I would guess an SJW would be tickled that the problem has an unbounded maximum. I suppose it depends on how one defines 'SJW' though.
- sidlls 9y agoYou'd guess wrongly. We'd "be tickled" at the exposure of the problem and how widespread and deep it is, not that it is widespread or deep.
- weberc2 9y agoYou and I define SJWs differently; I'm referring to the folks who insist problems are broader and deeper than they are, completely in spite of the evidence. For example, the folks who still think the wage gap is principally caused by discrimination.