Is that the case here, though? I didn't directly infer from the article that there was a cost to not expending the energy being held in the grid (i.e. does the

Is that the case here, though? I didn't directly infer from the article that there was a cost to not expending the energy being held in the grid (i.e. does the grid need to expel that excess?). If it needs to expel the excess to consumers, then absolutely the negative pricing makes perfect sense, but I got the impression that this was more a fortuitous set of variables than an intended outcome.