2 ms·
so silly this isn't included because of philosophical objections. tup is in some ways brilliant, and i give it kudos for actually improving on make in many way
by dilap 9y ago
so silly this isn't included because of philosophical objections.
tup is in some ways brilliant, and i give it kudos for actually improving on make in many ways (unlike 99% of the make-replacement-hopefuls), but man oh man do i value and prefer software devs with a more user-focused philosophy.
(an excellent example of that would be homebrew, which arguably wasn't anything special from a pure-tech perspective, but had amazingly good product sense/user focus. imagine combining that attitude & ux skills w/ the technical brilliance of tup...)