3 ms·
You're still missing killjoywashere's point. Their point was that _of course_ everyone involved (including the person you were originally replying to) knows th
by ncallaway 9y ago
You're still missing killjoywashere's point.
Their point was that _of course_ everyone involved (including the person you were originally replying to) knows that a weight-measurement is not sufficient to diagnose CHF. Literally everyone in the conversation has already presupposed that point.
However, blhack working with a physician learned that it would be a super useful medical tool to have an automated mechanism for taking those weight measurements because it's a useful early indicator.
Your response was exceptionally dismissive, given that there were people in that space who knew what they were doing and knew it was useful. Yet, you came by and in 10 seconds decided it wasn't useful and wasn't worth doing.
So, what makes you more qualified to make that decision that blhack and the physician they were working with? Why are you so arrogant to assume that the physician who stated that would be useful was just wrong?
Your insight wasn't particularly insightful, and you presented it in a way that was condescending and dismissive of others in the space.