3 ms·
The article mentions the larger carbon footprint of men. It is alos mentioned in the study: > One of the obstacles identified by prior research is that compare
by Quanttek 9y ago
The article mentions the larger carbon footprint of men. It is alos mentioned in the study:
> One of the obstacles identified by prior research is that compared to women, men are less likely to be eco-friendly in their attitudes, choices, and behaviors (Davidson and Freudenburg 1996; Lee and Holden 1999). Women display greater concern and willingness to take action to help the environment, and this effect is robust across age groups and countries (Cottrell 2003; Dietz, Kalof, and Stern 2002; Levin 1990; Zelezny, Chua, and Aldrich 2000). In contrast, men litter more (Kallgren, Reno, and Cialdini 2000), recycle less (Zelezny et al. 2000), have a larger overall carbon footprint (Reaty and Carlsson-Kanyama 2010), and feel less guilty about living a nongreen lifestyle (Tiller 2014)
That implies that women's consumption is also either less or has a smaller impact