3 ms·
It's not just contribution, it's about the ratio of what you take and what you contribute. Ideally, one should contribute as much as she/he takes. Of course, t
by justicezyx 9y ago
It's not just contribution, it's about the ratio of what you take and what you contribute.
Ideally, one should contribute as much as she/he takes. Of course, that's impossible and impractical.
I'd say the higher in the social rank, they ratio of contribution to taking drops exponentially, not linearly.
That's the problem.
- oreo81 9y agoI see it as the exact opposite.
- justicezyx 9y ago> I'd say the higher in the social rank, they ratio of contribution to taking drops exponentially, not linearly. You mean the richer people are, the ratio of their contribution to taking grows? That does not seem possible, because that will not make the person rich in the first place.
- oreo81 9y agoThey're rich in the first place because they've contributed more to society than other people.
- justicezyx 9y agoSure, I have no doubt that they contribute more than others. But the problem is the ratio of their taking far outpace the contribution.
- oreo81 9y agoThat's your opinion, what makes you the judge of other peoples social contributions?