4 ms·

it is very well accepted that low rep/heavy weight sets build muscle/strength vs. high reps/lower weights. the sample set is small to suggest anything empirica

it is very well accepted that low rep/heavy weight sets build muscle/strength vs. high reps/lower weights. the sample set is small to suggest anything empirical and to challenge the set notion that i just described above .. a nice read on the role of lactic acid w.r.t. muscles: http://www.csmngt.com/lactic_acid.htm http://www.csmngt.com/lactic_acid.htm

desigooner 16y ago
higher reps help in cardiovascular endurance. on the other hand, heavy weights/ low reps is much more of an effective stimulus for the body to produce HGH.
Snoddas 16y ago
Yeah My coach told me this ~25 years ago: - "low rep/heavy weight" if you want to look strong - "lighter weights/higher reps" if you want to get fit
leftnode 16y ago
To be honest, there's no such thing as muscle toning. Lower weight at higher reps won't do this. Muscles respond to resistance, and you need to consistently and constantly increase that resistance if you want to get larger/stronger. This is why all of the abdominal infomercials you see are bogus.
- desigooner 16y ago
  i think the more correct statement would be: there's no way to spot reduce fat. that's the reason most ab informercials are bogus. You'll see the abs if the overall body fat percentage is low. When i say toning, i mean aerobic exercises to lower body fat and weight training to firm up muscles. maybe i put it incorrectly in the original post. this is a nice read: http://www.exrx.net/WeightTraining/Myths.html http://www.exrx.net/WeightTraining/Myths.html
  - finnomenon 16y ago
    local fat reduction: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00600.x/abstract http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.... search for aminophylline.
    - desigooner 16y ago
      the 1200 kCal diet for the study is very alarming in my opinion. That's quite a lot of deficit compared to one's BMR and coupled with exercise, the study was bound to be a success. this following post pretty much dismisses the validity of the experiment you just linked: http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/02/miracle-thigh-cream-new-medical.html http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/02/miracle-thigh-cr...
- sofuture 16y ago
  Right. Muscles either grow, or don't grow. There's is no 'grow but only in a way that is toning and not actually growing bigger and stronger'. It's absurd how prevalent of a myth that is.
  - gaius 16y ago
    Not a simple as that. There is sarcoplasma volume and myofibril density. It depends on what your goal is. But if you are training in the hypertrophy range and getting stronger, then you must be getting bigger.

desigooner 16y ago

higher reps help in cardiovascular endurance. on the other hand, heavy weights/ low reps is much more of an effective stimulus for the body to produce HGH.

Snoddas 16y ago

Yeah My coach told me this ~25 years ago: - "low rep/heavy weight" if you want to look strong - "lighter weights/higher reps" if you want to get fit

leftnode 16y ago

To be honest, there's no such thing as muscle toning. Lower weight at higher reps won't do this. Muscles respond to resistance, and you need to consistently and constantly increase that resistance if you want to get larger/stronger. This is why all of the abdominal infomercials you see are bogus.

desigooner 16y ago
i think the more correct statement would be: there's no way to spot reduce fat. that's the reason most ab informercials are bogus. You'll see the abs if the overall body fat percentage is low. When i say toning, i mean aerobic exercises to lower body fat and weight training to firm up muscles. maybe i put it incorrectly in the original post. this is a nice read: http://www.exrx.net/WeightTraining/Myths.html http://www.exrx.net/WeightTraining/Myths.html
- finnomenon 16y ago
  local fat reduction: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00600.x/abstract http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.... search for aminophylline.
  - desigooner 16y ago
    the 1200 kCal diet for the study is very alarming in my opinion. That's quite a lot of deficit compared to one's BMR and coupled with exercise, the study was bound to be a success. this following post pretty much dismisses the validity of the experiment you just linked: http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/02/miracle-thigh-cream-new-medical.html http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/02/miracle-thigh-cr...
sofuture 16y ago
Right. Muscles either grow, or don't grow. There's is no 'grow but only in a way that is toning and not actually growing bigger and stronger'. It's absurd how prevalent of a myth that is.
- gaius 16y ago
  Not a simple as that. There is sarcoplasma volume and myofibril density. It depends on what your goal is. But if you are training in the hypertrophy range and getting stronger, then you must be getting bigger.