Ok, fair enough. In that case it's an argument in favour of finding out what the top wealth percentile gets that others don't that makes them better innovators.

Ok, fair enough. In that case it's an argument in favour of finding out what the top wealth percentile gets that others don't that makes them better innovators. My point is, if unlike me you read the study properly, you can still use it to set useful directions for further research, if not policy conclusions, rather than just justifying failure as the parent comment suggests.