3 ms·

I think the point is that Google shouldn't be in the name at all.

by icc97 9y ago

dullgiulio 9y ago
Why, people have been asking Google a lot of questions for a long time. I can imagine the marketing department in Google not loving the idea of another name for Google.
- icc97 9y ago
  I can see your point. They think that there is enough personality in Google as a thing. That certainly makes the most sense of what I've seen. However I think they missed on how personal a thing it is to talk to someone. I think they should have viewed 'OK Google' as a personality that's like Google's little brother, that will ask Google for you if that's what you need or else will for example check in your diary for you.
  - creep 9y ago
    Google doesn't need a personality. Seeing it as technology works perfectly especially when it goes wrong. It's easy to say something like, "Alexa is stupid, she can't understand a simple command", but referring to Google as tech, it is much easier to move on to reforming the command. It is also less invasive for me, personally. I'd rather refer to AI in personal terms.
dustinmoris 9y ago
You are missing the point. Even a random name wouldn't work when people talk about it. Alexa is the perfect example! Google did the right thing. Google home is what people talk about and "Ok Google" is what activities the device.
- StavrosK 9y ago
  That's because Google didn't give its assistant a personality. People talk about Alexa because personifying the software is powerful, otherwise they'd be talking about the Echo. Notice how, even in your post, you say "people talk about Google Home", but the equivalent to Google Home isn't Alexa, it's the Echo Dot.
- icc97 9y ago
  No it works perfectly well. It worked brilliantly with Siri and had done for years before. People talking about it in the same room is an inconvenience to overcome. It's possible that Google copied Baidu, which used "Ni hao baidu" [0] is the only thing I can think of. [0]: https://www.coursera.org/learn/machine-learning-projects/lecture/WNPap/transfer-learning https://www.coursera.org/learn/machine-learning-projects/lec... (see the video transcript)
daveFNbuck 9y ago
What I'm responding to: > Having to say "OK, Google" instead of just "Google" (or "Alexa") is a deal-breaker.
dionian 9y ago
"ok google" is a dealbreaker to me, but not because of google. who starts a sentence with "ok"? "hey siri" makes a bit more sense since at least you are interacting with it in a normal way. it's still weird but less robotic than 'ok google', and it's also much better than 'hey apple' for that matter
- jacksmith21006 9y ago
  That is why I say "hey google" instead as easier to say. Our Echo gets a lot of false positives where the Google home does not. Google made the right choice in terms of usability.

I think the point is that Google shouldn't be in the name at all.

by icc97 9y ago

I think the point is that Google shouldn't be in the name at all.

Why, people have been asking Google a lot of questions for a long time. I can imagine the marketing department in Google not loving the idea of another name for Google.

icc97 9y ago
I can see your point. They think that there is enough personality in Google as a thing. That certainly makes the most sense of what I've seen. However I think they missed on how personal a thing it is to talk to someone. I think they should have viewed 'OK Google' as a personality that's like Google's little brother, that will ask Google for you if that's what you need or else will for example check in your diary for you.
- creep 9y ago
  Google doesn't need a personality. Seeing it as technology works perfectly especially when it goes wrong. It's easy to say something like, "Alexa is stupid, she can't understand a simple command", but referring to Google as tech, it is much easier to move on to reforming the command. It is also less invasive for me, personally. I'd rather refer to AI in personal terms.

dustinmoris 9y ago

You are missing the point. Even a random name wouldn't work when people talk about it. Alexa is the perfect example! Google did the right thing. Google home is what people talk about and "Ok Google" is what activities the device.

StavrosK 9y ago
That's because Google didn't give its assistant a personality. People talk about Alexa because personifying the software is powerful, otherwise they'd be talking about the Echo. Notice how, even in your post, you say "people talk about Google Home", but the equivalent to Google Home isn't Alexa, it's the Echo Dot.
icc97 9y ago
No it works perfectly well. It worked brilliantly with Siri and had done for years before. People talking about it in the same room is an inconvenience to overcome. It's possible that Google copied Baidu, which used "Ni hao baidu" [0] is the only thing I can think of. [0]: https://www.coursera.org/learn/machine-learning-projects/lecture/WNPap/transfer-learning https://www.coursera.org/learn/machine-learning-projects/lec... (see the video transcript)

daveFNbuck 9y ago

What I'm responding to: > Having to say "OK, Google" instead of just "Google" (or "Alexa") is a deal-breaker.

dionian 9y ago

"ok google" is a dealbreaker to me, but not because of google. who starts a sentence with "ok"? "hey siri" makes a bit more sense since at least you are interacting with it in a normal way. it's still weird but less robotic than 'ok google', and it's also much better than 'hey apple' for that matter

jacksmith21006 9y ago
That is why I say "hey google" instead as easier to say. Our Echo gets a lot of false positives where the Google home does not. Google made the right choice in terms of usability.