3 ms·
> he could have retired early only 10 years later. That is a flawed argument. 10 years later you might not have the same drive/ambition which you have right no
by sumedh 9y ago
> he could have retired early only 10 years later.
That is a flawed argument. 10 years later you might not have the same drive/ambition which you have right now.
- purplethinking 9y agoMaybe, but sounds a bit like future discounting to me. I'm just presenting my dilemma, and I don't think the solution is to be idle for 10 years and then switch to entrepeneurship overnight. More like work a normal job and try to get stuff going on the side, but don't risk your life savings for a lottery ticket.