3 ms·
/facepalm I WANT 2 way binding so I could achieve what I wanted to achieve. The only way to get the performance out of angular 2 was to NOT use 2 way binding
by philliphaydon 9y ago
/facepalm
I WANT 2 way binding so I could achieve what I wanted to achieve.
The only way to get the performance out of angular 2 was to NOT use 2 way binding and hack it together.
Vue / React examples didn't suffer from 8 seconds of render time using 2 way binding on a large number of elements.
You can sit and defend angular 2 all you want, doesn't change the fact it's terrible.
Let's not even get into the angular api 2 changing after they said it wouldn't. And regressions of the angular cli, and breaking changes on minor updates.
- jordache 9y agoall performan comparisons out there have the three frameworks neck and neck. Your anecdote is certainly interesting in terms of the diffference in performance. I would chalk it up as poor implementation / understanding of angular, rather than some special edge case that tested the limitation of angular