3 ms·
Motorola G Plus[0] is 184$ with a 12Mp back camera. You won’t catch a cat jumping in pixel perfect beauty, but that’s plenty enough to scan a text document. Sa
by hrktb 9y ago
Motorola G Plus[0] is 184$ with a 12Mp back camera. You won’t catch a cat jumping in pixel perfect beauty, but that’s plenty enough to scan a text document.
Same for your mail, maps, browsing, messaging, light gaming. It won’t be blazingly fast under the latest OS, but will do any important task with decent performance.
[0] https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B01N6NTIRH/ref=mp_s_a_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1514329936&sr=8-3&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_QL65&keywords=motorola+phone&dpPl=1&dpID=51DjUO0f4PL&ref=plSrch https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B01N6NTIRH/ref=mp_s_a_1_3?ie=...
- user5994461 9y agoThe number of pixels has zero relevance to the quality of a photo. The world is filled with cheap phones that will make a blurry picture if there isn't perfect lighting or if you move by a single millimeter when you press the button.
- hrktb 9y agoOf course. I found it interesting that scanning a document is the exact best case scenario: exposure can be adjusted with the flash, and the document hopefully doesn’t move (I had the previous Motorola G, hand shaking would need to be pretty bad to make it blur when using the flash)
- user5994461 9y agoOn the contrary I take it as an example of bad case scenario. Texts and annotations can be very small, a tad of blurriness and it's unreadable. The blurriness might not be apparent on the phone screen but it's very noticeable on a computer or TV. I speak from experience with a cheap phone, having to take 6 photos not moving by a iota hoping one will be good enough. Same shit next month when I will have to take a newer proof of address.
- WWLink 9y agoI got a G5 plus for my brother earlier this year, and after using it a little bit i felt kinda ripped off with my iphone 7+.. all that money and the motorola does everything just fine!