4 ms·
I just went through a similar system at Hong Kong. It worked well and I breezed through the automated gates while a long line of people were backed up at the tr
by marklyon 9y ago
I just went through a similar system at Hong Kong. It worked well and I breezed through the automated gates while a long line of people were backed up at the traditional line. Perhaps they just did a better job of designing the system, but you scan your passport at one station and then step forward into a scannner with a sign telling you where to look. A gate closes behind you. If it fails, it flagged a human to that lane but kept you locked in the box. In my case, it beeped and opened the door into the terminal.
I’ve lost a significant amount of weight since my passport photo was taken. Several human border guards in other counties suggested I get a new passport. One required me to show a second form of ID. The camera system had no issue.
- rhizome 9y agoSo, the "facial recording" worked, but the recognition didn't?
- rconti 9y agoIt's worth noting that the US does not have exit immigration, so this wouldn't be a "step up" in the same way, but of course your comments about how well it works stand.
- robjan 9y agoAre you sure about that? The Hong Kong frequent flyer e-gates are supposed to check your right thumbprint.
- marklyon 9y agoNow that you mention it, I did scan my fingerprints. Don’t know what they compared them with - I literally crossed the border an hour before by car and didn’t scan my fingerprints there.