4 ms·
No, it really isn't. Because if she signed, then he's basically free to cheat on her at will, and there really isn't anything she can do about it. If she were t
by s73ver_ 9y ago
No, it really isn't. Because if she signed, then he's basically free to cheat on her at will, and there really isn't anything she can do about it. If she were to divorce, she would be out in the cold.
Why, apparently, is it acceptable for him to have a "contingency plan", but not her?
- wolfgke 9y ago> No, it really isn't. Because if she signed, then he's basically free to cheat on her at will, and there really isn't anything she can do about it. As far as I understand the Reddit post, the post-nuptial agreement is only about his new business venture and not about other, existing assets. So he still has something to lose, if they divorce.
- shepardrtc 9y agoNo, she didn't specify what it was about.