2 ms·
Double-blind tests are necessary but not sufficient. Without the double-blind tests, the process simply has no credibility at all. The double-blind tests establ
by TheCoelacanth 9y ago
Double-blind tests are necessary but not sufficient. Without the double-blind tests, the process simply has no credibility at all. The double-blind tests establish that credibility.
However, the 6th amendment also guarantees defendants the right to confront their accusers. Without the source code, they are unable to do this.
- CompanionCuuube 9y agoHow have courts obtained the source code of human eyewitnesses all these years?
- TheCoelacanth 9y agoObviously there is no source code, but you can cross-examine a human eyewitness. There is no way to cross-examine an algorithm. Eyewitnesses that can't be cross-examined are only allowed in court in very rare circumstances, such as when the defendant killed them to prevent them from testifying.