there is some nuance that ought to be given, since a) 4% of professionals dissent, and b) That's roughly the same % of professionals that I've heard dissent ab

there is some nuance that ought to be given, since a) 4% of professionals dissent, and b) That's roughly the same % of professionals that I've heard dissent about global warming, yet dissenting about that will get you labeled as stupid and/or corrupt. So what makes it worth calling out for nuance here?