It's misleading not because it's false (it's not!), but because it's selectively leaving out context. The original title is better. I'm not saying there's no

It's misleading not because it's false (it's not!), but because it's selectively leaving out context. The original title is better. I'm not saying there's no free speech dimension here, just that the original (since-corrected) hacker-news title was more click bait than accurate summary.