3 ms·
“Can’t protect” is weird language to use when it wasn’t DeepMind who approached the other party. The article says it was the other way around. To me it looks l
by dontreact 9y ago
“Can’t protect” is weird language to use when it wasn’t DeepMind who approached the other party. The article says it was the other way around.
To me it looks like the NHS wasn’t really careful, threw a lot of data at DeepMind and they said yes. After getting burned like this I am willing to bet they will be a lot more careful in the future.
- mft_ 9y agoIndeed - the article refers to subsequent agreements between DeepMind and the NHS which did fulfil the necessary requirements. I don't think there's much of a story here apart from basic incompetence in a single instance - mostly on the part of the NHS trust (who really should have known better) in not understanding or applying the necessary governance, and partly DeepMind likewise. But of course, without the hand-wringing and links to Google and advertising, there's much less of a story to promote...