3 ms·
Not everyone accepts that the object systems in Java and .NET are fully object-oriented.
by bruceboughton 16y ago
Not everyone accepts that the object systems in Java and .NET are fully object-oriented.
- loup-vaillant 16y agoConsidering that no definition of "object-oriented" is accepted by everyone, I'm not sure your criticism is valid. My suggestion: drop the term "object-oriented" altogether, and refer to more specific features.
- bruceboughton 16y agoWhich brings me back round to my initial assertion: >> You can like lambdas without wanting to go fully functional
- loup-vaillant 16y agoWell, F# and Ocaml aren't purely functional… so you're right.